UniServe Science
Return to Gallery
Science Communicator

Peter Macinnis is a science communicator and writer who works for various publishers including Webster Publishing, as well as contributing to ABC radio and ABC online.

In which area or areas of science do you work? When did you first become interested in this career? How did you first become interested in this career?
What education and training do you have for your job and how long has it taken? How has your career progressed? What are the tasks that you do in a typical day?
What skills do you use in your job? What do you enjoy most about your job? What has been a highlight of your career?
What is the most exciting aspect of your job? What do you like least about your job? What are some alternative jobs that you would be qualified for?
What are some of the advantages of working in this field? What are some of the disadvantages of working in this field? How has your work contributed to science?
How has your work benefited society? Where do you see yourself in five years time? Find out more about Science Writing and Communication from Peter

In which area or areas of science do you work?

I am a science writer/science communicator: I chase all of the sweet science that is happening and write it up for our encyclopaedia (WebsterWorld). I also do books, both for children (through Puffin/Penguin) and for a more general and adult audience through Allen and Unwin. I also do radio talks, especially Ockham's Razor on ABC, and I have just done my second essay for The Slab, the ABC's online science site.

I trained as a botanist, but I have to be as at home with quantum computing, the fine structure constant or Martian plate tectonics as I am with the inner workings of a bryophyte. That mainly requires a good general background knowledge of the sciences, and the ability to get to grips with the intricacies -- or to know somebody who can clarify it. I tend to use one particular e-mail list as a sounding board-cum-question place -- though most of the questions are asked by others.


[Return to Questions]

When did you first become interested in this career?

I think I have always assumed I would be a writer of some sort, but originally, I planned to write technically precise science fiction -- but I was born too late for that. So I turned to explaining science.


[Return to Questions]

How did you first become interested in this career?

It found me, really. I was dabbling a bit, but I was planning a rather different sort of school text, based on the actual work of scientists, described so that the experiments they did could be repeated or at least analysed, and I found a bit of fraud that is on the Web (see Fraudo the Frog?) -- two chemists had faked their data, it seemed. I phoned Robyn Williams, expecting him to interview me, but he asked me to write it -- and if the length was right, he would use it on "Ockham's Razor", otherwise on the "Science Show".

Now back then, a few people were communicating about science, but it wasn't a career, so I was an education bureaucrat, but I decided to join the Powerhouse Museum which was about to open, because I was groping my way to doing something abou the public understanding of science, as it used to be called.


[Return to Questions]

What education and training do you have for your job and how long has it taken?

Ah, yes, education. Well, I completed ten first-year courses before I graduated, and took seven years to get there -- I did lots of reading during that time, and I used to read "New Scientist" and "Scientific American" -- they used to take months to arrive then, and I read lots of books, but that was for fun and information.

I'm not at all sure I have the qualifications now -- it is partly a matter of getting the material, partly a matter of acting like a journalist to find an interesting slant, and part of it is staying on top of what is happening -- plus keeping up a network of contacts who will tell me what is happening. Sadly, only three and a half Australian universities do a good job of that. The rest think public relations is getting the Vice-chancellor or the Chancellor on the front page (or off it).

[Return to Questions]

How has your career progressed?

I am now at the stage where I have all the work I want, and it tends to find me. I get rather fussy if a deadline is endangered, because that is a contract, so far as I am concerned. I also know that I will only continue to get people shoving work at me if I deliver on schedule. At this stage, I have enough new work from word of mouth to keep me happy -- given that I still have a day job.

It all works very well -- at the moment, I am researching a book on the history of rockets, so I did a piece for my work when I went to Woomera to see the Hyshot 2 scramjet launch, and when the ABC people found I was going, I was asked if I would like to do a piece for "The Slab". I over-wrote on that, and took that in as part of the first chapter of the book, and then cut it much finer for a different readership.

[Return to Questions]

What are the tasks that you do in a typical day?

What's a typical day? I often say that if I went to school now, I would be diagnosed as ADHD -- I spent a number of years as a teacher, and I have tried to be the sort of teacher to kids like me that some of my better teachers were to me. I need to have five things going on at once, so when I get bored, I switch.

I may find myself e-mailing somebody whose work has just appeared in "Nature" or "Science", or requesting a paper on geophysics, or reading one -- I like to get two or three stories done each day, but on a good day, I might generate as many as a dozen stories, averaging about 600 words, and generally each has several cross-references to other stories.

Or I might go off on a tangent -- I am creating a massive online poetry collection, and an even bigger prose collection -- all those classic scenes from literature like "Oliver asks for more", excerpts from Pepys' diary or Banks' journal, key letters from famous scientists, or anything that seems to fit. Or I may find myself burrowing in the innards of JavaScript, trying to fix an error, editing some pictures I took at the Eureka Awards last night (August 13), and getting them all online.

[Return to Questions]

What skills do you use in your job?

Spotting what is interesting or sweet science, stuff that paradigms may one day be made of, clever ruses to tackle cancer (OK, most of them will fail), but they illustrate how people solve problems like using cold germs that are engineered to fight cancer.

Most of all, I use my BS-detector to dodge the press releases that are dodgy or have a high bovine excreta quotient, and I always demand a copy of the paper, which will come as a PDF so I can read what was actually said. That aside, it is a matter of telling a complex tale in simple words, and linking it. I get 200-300 e-mails a day, of which I give good attention to maybe 50 or 100, so skip-reading is a DEFINITE must.

[Return to Questions]

What do you enjoy most about your job?

Finding out what is REALLY going on, and getting the news out correctly before the print media. I rather hope that I am setting some sort of a pattern that others may, in the future, be constrained to follow, actually getting the science right.

[Return to Questions]

What has been a highlight of your career?

I rather hope that one will be seen to have happened in the past couple of weeks, but I won't know until Friday, when we hear what happened with Hyshot 2. If the scramjet worked, that was the equivalent of the Wright Brothers in 1903, or Goddard's Auburn rocket in 1926, the world's first liquid-fuel rocket -- and I was there to see the launch.

Just as I refuse to admit to any more than advanced middle age, so I refuse to admit to "the highlight" -- but in the past, I have done several delightful fraud investigations that are in the public domain (Dulong and Petit's Law, the high-power low-morals marketing of the PLATO computer-based education system, which I blew out of the water), and one other which is confidential. I enjoy nailing crooks by analysing the data and showing that something does not compute.

[Return to Questions]

What is the most exciting aspect of your job?

Probably the chance to get the real scientists opening up about their work. Sadly, many of them clam up when they hear there is a journalist is around. I am not formally trained as a journo, and my role is often more like that of a reference librarian, so I tend to call myself a science writer.

[Return to Questions]

What do you enjoy least about your job?

Not having enough time to do all the stories.

I have a delightful story about how the Delphic oracle used to get high on volcanic gases seeping through a fissure, and when that closed, the oracle stopped operating. I will get around to writing that story one day, but it has been waiting six months now, and there are about a hundred more like it.

[Return to Questions]

What are some alternative jobs that you would be qualified for?

Teaching science, computing or mathematics, writing bad limericks, being a paperweight for small pieces of paper.

[Return to Questions]

What are some of the advantages to working in this field?

The sheer joy of being able to drive the enquiries in a direction that suit me. Like I said, any mundane judge would class me as ADHD.

[Return to Questions]

What are some of the disadvantages to working in this field?

None that I can see

[Return to Questions]

How has your work contributed to science?

I like to think I have encouraged some scientists by my interest, and I may well have got a few people interested in science. It is guess work, but I expect that I am winning on that one.

[Return to Questions]

How has your work benefited society?

By the hoped-for contributions listed above. But as I indicated earlier, I am working at the pointy edge of a new technology -- we don't know where it will go, but I hope we are raising the bar a bit -- right now, our Australian CD-ROMs are the second best sellers in America, and we are trampling on Encarta's heels. If we force them to change (and we have already done that to some of the others), then we have certainly been of benefit.

The "Renaissance Man" may no longer exist, but renaissance people can exist if knowledge and information can be packaged in such a way that people may get wisdom and insight from it.

[Return to Questions]

Where do you see yourself in 5 years time?

Probably doing much the same thing, perhaps dropping the day job to three days a week, because there are LOTS of books I want to write.

[Return to Questions]

Find out more about Science Writing and Communication

If you wish to ask Peter for additional information, you can email UniServe Science and we will contact Peter for you. Make sure you include Peter's name and occupation in the Subject line.

You can find out more about Peter from

and his other interests and activities from

Find out more about other Science Communicators


[Return to Top of Page]

For further information contact
Kaye Placing

© 1997 - 2008 UniServe Connections

Page Maintained By: BioSciCH@mail.usyd.edu.au
Last Update: Tuesday, 03-Jan-2006 14:25:57 EST
URL: http://science.uniserve.edu.au//faces/peter/peter.html